Re: REVIEW: Mercenary Rutger Shaw
Posted by Billiam Babble on Mar 14, 2010; 4:01pm
URL: http://the-lost-and-the-damned.71.s1.nabble.com/REVIEW-Mercenary-Rutger-Shaw-tp4722811p4732291.html
I tried to reply to this last night but my technology rebelled.
You've got to love the combination of trench coats, goggles and swords! You reminded how contemporary / mad max or cyberpunk some of the Necromunda gangers look. Would you say that some of the Warmachine figures look almost Edwardian or romantic WWI?
Good point about the holster. I used to hate arguments about exact weapons, and must admit a friend put me off playing Mordheim because he was a stickler for exact representation of equipment.
Yep, down with gay stat cards! :D
The steanpunk look of the Warmachine dreadnoughts always intrigued me - there's quite a few D&D / eberron / planes constructs which look very similar in the monster manuals (3.5).
Cool. I mean Word!
URL: http://the-lost-and-the-damned.71.s1.nabble.com/REVIEW-Mercenary-Rutger-Shaw-tp4722811p4732291.html
I tried to reply to this last night but my technology rebelled.
You've got to love the combination of trench coats, goggles and swords! You reminded how contemporary / mad max or cyberpunk some of the Necromunda gangers look. Would you say that some of the Warmachine figures look almost Edwardian or romantic WWI?
Good point about the holster. I used to hate arguments about exact weapons, and must admit a friend put me off playing Mordheim because he was a stickler for exact representation of equipment.
Yep, down with gay stat cards! :D
The steanpunk look of the Warmachine dreadnoughts always intrigued me - there's quite a few D&D / eberron / planes constructs which look very similar in the monster manuals (3.5).
Cool. I mean Word!
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |